🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an celebration that was initiated as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has adopted a commercial tone, expanding to include functions where Black people are compensated to talk to predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The wave has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

Initially celebrated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with seven days of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the UK, Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The month has developed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the narratives of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and more on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the month is observed is a indication of the political moment. How it progresses is a valuable example in how co-option leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has hindered the purpose of it, which is to address systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month better than the specific period in which it falls this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the shape of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the UK's past. Kemi Badenoch, the Black leader of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a legislator feels emboldened to state that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, far-right parties are surging in the EU as a complete entity.

In the US, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the country. A campaign to scrub Black history and legacy from the records is ongoing. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives focused on the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the observance symbolises how minimally it can be influential if it is confined to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or politically neutered festivities of contributions in the past, rather than addressing the conditions of the current era. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is needed. Denise Miller, a prof at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the short-term symbolic gestures of the month. “The issue with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a urge to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month entirely, believing they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an era that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of racial movements – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an framework that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month look like? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed across all seasons (as various establishments are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not avoid politics, and provides room for citizens, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is simple recognition of the past when it ignores the contemporary truth of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the public spaces? Establishments who observe it should not be reassured with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but faced with the risks that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and responsive. Perhaps an total re-identification is necessary – Black History is Now Month.